🇺🇸▼
Germany initiated World War I in 1914 with the unshakeable conviction that a rapid victory against France would be followed immediately by the defeat of Russia. This expectation of a swift triumph was grounded in a rigid military doctrine that failed to account for the industrial and logistical realities of modern warfare. Instead, the conflict metastasized into an extended global struggle of attrition, culminating in a catastrophic loss that claimed approximately 16 million lives. While the Allied powers demonstrated remarkable resilience and adaptability, Germany's ultimate defeat was not merely a result of enemy strength but was significantly driven by a series of profound strategic and operational errors. The war's outcome was determined by the military weakness of Germany's allies, the catastrophic failure of its initial battle plan, the necessity of fighting a prolonged war on two separate fronts, and the failure to fully mobilize its economy for total warfare. Furthermore, an Allied naval blockade severed vital supply lines, while Germany's submarine campaign proved strategically ineffective in securing a decisive victory. The German military invested heavily in expensive, underutilized weapons such as massive battleships and Zeppelin airships, which failed to alter the course of the war. German generals critically underestimated the potential of tanks and failed to adequately supply their advancing troops. Unlike the Allies, Germany did not implement a sustainable system to rotate exhausted soldiers from the front lines, leading to a collapse in morale. Finally, Germany's decision to attack civilian vessels, known as unrestricted submarine warfare, contributed directly to the United States entering the war in 1917. By 1918, Germany could no longer match the Allies in terms of manpower, technological capability, or economic resources.
In contrast, when it came to the crunch, the Allies of France, Britain, and the United States worked together to form a strong partnership. There was substantial assistance, too, from France's colonies (nearly half a million men) and parts of the British Empire (particularly Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and India). Other important Allies were Belgium, Italy, Japan, and, until 1917, Russia. All of these states had their own objectives in participating in the war, but a common reason was to prevent a hyperaggressive Germany from dominating Europe. Germany's allies had no such common objective.
Germany's first significant challenge was the inherent military weakness of its alliance partners. Prior to the outbreak of hostilities, the Triple Entente, consisting of Britain, France, and Russia, faced off against the Triple Alliance, which included Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. The Austrian-Hungarian army, a cornerstone of the Central Powers, relied on outdated tactics and obsolete equipment that proved ill-suited for modern trench warfare. Italy proved to be an unreliable partner and eventually switched sides to join the Allies in 1915. Although Germany was later joined by the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria, none of these nations possessed top-tier armies capable of holding their own against the combined might of the Entente. Additionally, Germany's overseas empire was considerably smaller and less developed than those of Britain and France. Colonies such as German South West Africa could not provide substantial aid for a war fought primarily in European theaters.
Germany was forced to constantly divert scarce resources of money, weapons, and soldiers to prop up its struggling allies. Once these allies were defeated or collapsed, the enemy was able to focus its entire military might directly against Germany. As one prominent historian noted, without this critical aid, "the various fronts would not have held." After the collapse of its partners, "it was impossible for Germany to resist much longer." In stark contrast, the Allies formed a robust and cohesive partnership. France, Britain, and later the United States coordinated their efforts effectively, pooling resources and intelligence. France and Britain also received substantial assistance from their vast colonial empires, including troops and materials from Canada, Australia, and India. Other Allies included Belgium, Italy, and Japan. While each nation had its own specific goals, a common purpose was to halt an aggressive Germany from dominating Europe. Germany's allies lacked this unified sense of mission and strategic coordination.
The Schlieffen Plan had other consequences. Germany had started the war by mobilising through Belgium and was clearly the aggressor. Allied troops were thereafter fighting to clear either their own land or that of their allies of the German invaders, a situation that meant morale on the side of the Allies remained robust throughout the conflict. German troops, on the other hand, were fighting for an expansion of the German Empire, rather than the defence of their homeland.
The United States Army officially entered the war in 1918, but the U.S. government had been supporting its allies with loans and supplies throughout the conflict. By the war's conclusion, the U.S. had loaned its allies $10 billion, a staggering sum for the era. Weapons, ammunition, and food were shipped across the Atlantic Ocean, successfully defying the threat of German submarines and providing the Allies with the resources necessary to match, and then surpass, Germany's production capabilities.
The Schlieffen Plan was Germany's strategic blueprint for achieving a quick victory through a massive encirclement maneuver. Developed in 1905 by Count Alfred von Schlieffen, the plan dictated that Germany should attack and defeat France within six weeks by sweeping through neutral Belgium. Once France was defeated, Germany could then redirect its full military attention to the slower-moving Russian army. Even within the German high command, generals believed the plan was overly ambitious and worried that their army was not large enough to succeed against such a massive operation.
When the plan was executed in August 1914, the Allies proved far more resilient than anticipated. Belgium defended its fortresses with exceptional bravery, buying crucial time for the Allies to mobilize. The Allies managed to launch a decisive counterattack at the First Battle of the Marne in September, halting the German advance. Both sides subsequently dug in, creating a stalemate of trench warfare that would last for years and drain the manpower of both sides. Germany was simply unprepared for a prolonged conflict of attrition, as the plan assumed a war of movement.
The German Army could not resupply its men with sufficient food or material since it did not have adequate transport. Railway lines were left behind as the German army advanced, and the dependency on horses proved a real weakness. In 1918, the German Army had only 23,000 trucks compared to the Allies' 100,000. In addition, the Allied blockade of Germany meant materials were in short supply. Despite this weakness, a drive to make the German economy more of a full war economy was only decided in the summer of 1918.
The failure of the plan revealed a deep flaw in the German command structure. German field generals were permitted to pursue local opportunities, even when doing so undermined the overall strategy. This often meant that armies advanced too far, creating weak points held by exhausted troops. The main objective—capturing Paris—was abandoned to chase the retreating French army, which was never destroyed, exposing the German flank to attack. Throughout the war, German generals frequently wasted promising starts for short-term glory. The plan also demonstrated that moving armies was one challenge, but supplying them was another. The troops advancing under the Schlieffen Plan ran out of ammunition, food, and reinforcements after just a few weeks. Their supply lines became excessively long and vulnerable. The failure to resolve these logistical problems was a major weakness for Germany throughout the war. Finally, by attacking through neutral Belgium, Germany clearly established itself as the aggressor. Allied troops were fighting to liberate their own land or that of their allies, which kept their morale high. German troops, however, were fighting to expand an empire rather than defend their homeland, a distinction that affected their willingness to endure hardship.
German weapons were superior during the early stages of the war. The MG08 machine gun was deadly effective, capable of mowing down charging infantry. Germany pioneered the use of flamethrowers and was the first to deploy poison gas on a large scale. However, the Allies quickly adapted to these innovations. Snipers targeted flamethrower operators, and the invention of gas masks significantly reduced the lethal effect of the chemical weapons.
Even worse than coming second in the arms race, German militarists realised they had spent on the wrong kind of weaponry. The days of battleships blasting each other on the high seas were already over. There was only one major naval engagement of WWI, the Battle of Jutland in May-June 1916. Both sides claimed a victory of sorts, but the pertinent fact was that, thereafter, the power of the Royal Navy obliged the German naval fleets to stay in port and out of harm's way for the rest of the war. As a contemporary edition of the New York Times put it: "The German Navy has assaulted its jailer, but is still in jail" (Winter, 335).
A German innovation that ultimately failed was the Zeppelin airship, which was used to bomb cities like Paris and London. Limited technology, a small number of airships, and vulnerability to fighter planes meant these raids caused little lasting damage to infrastructure or enemy morale. As the war progressed, the Allies took the lead in military innovation. Senior German generals failed to recognize the potential of modern weapons like the tank, or the benefits of combining artillery, infantry, tanks, and air support. Allied generals learned to use tanks effectively, proving their value at the Battle of Cambrai in late 1917. For Germany, the lesson came too late. A military historian noted, "Germany's failure to match the Allies in tank development must be judged one of their worst military miscalculations of the war."
Germany's logistics were consistently poor. As the army advanced, it left railway lines behind and relied heavily on horses, which could not keep up with the pace of mechanized warfare. By 1918, the German Army had only 23,000 trucks, compared to 100,000 for the Allies. The Allied blockade made materials scarce, and a full shift to a war economy was not decided until the summer of 1918, which was far too late. The German concept of stormtroopers—using elite soldiers in small groups to attack enemy lines—was tactically effective but caused high casualties. Germany steadily lost its best troops through this method. Also, unlike the Allies, Germany did not rotate soldiers away from the fiercest fighting to quieter areas to rest, leading to a psychological and physical exhaustion that undermined their combat effectiveness.
Before the war, Germany attempted to build a navy large enough to challenge Britain's Royal Navy. This was a naval arms race that Germany could not win due to the sheer economic disparity. Britain, the world's wealthiest nation in 1914, was determined to maintain its naval lead to protect its global empire of 400 million people. By 1914, Britain possessed twice as many dreadnought battleships as Germany.
Worse, Germany had spent money on the wrong weapons. The era of major battleship clashes was ending, yet Germany invested heavily in capital ships. The only significant naval battle of World War I was the Battle of Jutland in 1916. Afterward, the power of the Royal Navy forced the German fleet to remain in port, a state of confinement that a newspaper at the time described: "The German Navy has assaulted its jailer, but is still in jail."
Germany then switched to submarine warfare. Despite early successes, the U-boat campaign became less effective as the Allies developed countermeasures. The Allies used armed convoys, air support, and mines to protect their ships. The convoy system was highly effective. Of 88,000 ships traveling in convoys, only 436 were torpedoed. This allowed Allied shipbuilding to outpace losses. Although U-boats sank over 5,000 ships, Germany could not win the war with submarines alone. Unrestricted submarine warfare had serious diplomatic consequences. In May 1915, a German submarine sank the passenger liner RMS Lusitania, killing 1,198 civilians, including 128 Americans. This caused outrage in the United States. Germany briefly restricted its submarine attacks but resumed unrestricted warfare in February 1917. This, along with the discovery of a secret German telegram proposing an alliance with Mexico, finally pushed the United States to declare war on Germany in April 1917.
The spring of 1918 represented Germany's last chance for victory. Russia had left the war after its 1917 revolution, allowing Germany to move 44 divisions from the Eastern Front to the Western Front. Here, each side had about 4 million men, but tens of thousands of fresh U.S. troops were arriving every week. The German commander, General Erich von Ludendorff, knew he had to attack immediately before American power became insurmountable. He launched five major offensives, known as the German Spring Offensive or Ludendorff Offensive.
In the end, the offensive wasted 800,000 German soldiers as casualties and achieved no lasting strategic gain. Desperate and exhausted, German troops began to retreat. Morale collapsed, both in the army and at home, as the reality of defeat became undeniable. Facing certain defeat, German leaders asked for an armistice, which began on November 11, 1918. World War I was over. Germany's early confidence and flawed plans had led to a long, bloody conflict it could not win. The failure to integrate new technologies, the logistical inability to sustain a long war, and the diplomatic blunders regarding submarine warfare ensured that the Central Powers would ultimately fall.