🇺🇸▼
In contemporary society, there exists a profound and pervasive obsession with the concept of authenticity. To be authentic is to remain true to one's own identity, to express one's genuine feelings honestly, and to refuse the pretense of adopting a persona that does not reflect one's true nature. However, this intense desire is far from a novel phenomenon. For centuries, philosophers have grappled with the intricate and difficult question of what it truly signifies to be true to oneself. In the present day, young people, frequently designated as Generation Z, appear to champion the ideal of authenticity with a fervor unmatched by any preceding generation. According to a recent comprehensive report issued by the prominent business consulting firm Ernst & Young, more than nine out of ten young individuals stated that being authentic and remaining true to oneself is of extreme or very high importance. In fact, the majority of respondents claimed that this specific value holds greater significance than any other personal principle they possess.
This striking finding comes as no great surprise to observers of the modern condition. We all inhabit an era in which we are constantly bombarded by the relentless currents of social media platforms and sophisticated artificial intelligence systems. In such a world, the arduous task of striving to be one's authentic self becomes increasingly difficult to achieve. Social media frequently encourages individuals to present a perfectly curated, polished image of their lives rather than revealing their true, unvarnished selves. Simultaneously, the algorithms that govern these platforms can subtly shape what we see, think, and value, making it progressively harder to distinguish our own independent thoughts from those suggestions engineered by technology. Yet, even though becoming authentic has evolved into a common and widely accepted goal for many, it remains unclear precisely how many individuals can truly define the specific concept of "authenticity" that they claim to pursue with such dedication. It is also worth asking a critical question: Are sincerity and authenticity timeless human virtues, or are they merely temporary obsessions unique to this specific technological age?
As a scholar who has dedicated my career to studying the history of political thought and the development of American political systems, I believe that the insights of two specific philosophers can help us understand this complex problem and determine how best to address it: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Martin Heidegger. Their ideas, though written centuries apart, offer powerful intellectual tools for analyzing our modern, desperate search for the self.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau was an eighteenth-century philosopher hailing from Geneva. He arrived on the intellectual stage following the earlier thinkers known as Enlightenment philosophers, such as Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Montesquieu. These earlier thinkers laid many of the foundational pillars for how people understand liberal democracy in the modern world. They emphasized the paramount importance of individual natural rights. To paraphrase Thomas Jefferson's later, famous formulation, all human beings are "endowed" with these inherent rights at birth or by nature itself. In particular, Thomas Hobbes popularized the concept of creating a commonwealth, or a structured society, designed to help humanity escape the uncertainty and chaos of a state of nature, where the most fundamental goal is simply self-preservation. John Locke also placed a strong emphasis on the right to own property, while Montesquieu highlighted the importance of international commerce, along with other critical aspects such as the separation of powers within a government.
However, Rousseau became famous for his sharp and relentless criticisms of the individualistic civil society that was born out of the work of those earlier philosophers. In the modern commercial republic, the collective focus shifted dramatically from duty to luxury. Rousseau wrote that "Ancient politicians spoke incessantly about morals and virtue," but "those of our time talk only of business and money." He believed that modern society had transformed into a conformist "herd," where everyone hides behind a thick "veil" of artificial politeness. People don social masks to conceal their selfishness and inner desires. They deceive others in order to satisfy their own personal wants and to gain the approval of the crowd.
In this manner, Rousseau argued, human beings are actually enslaved to one another. While each person pursues their own narrow self-interest, achieving success in this system requires convincing others to see some "profit" in helping each other. The rich need the "services" of the poor just as the poor need the "help" of the rich. Anyone who refuses to yield to this entire enterprise of mutual exploitation "will die in poverty and oblivion." Sincerity is the path to self-realization in Rousseau's political philosophy, according to political science professor Arthur Melzer. As Melzer states, "We want, as fully as possible, to become what we are, to realize ourselves, to become as alive and actualized as possible, to really live." For Rousseau, sincerity was what put us on "the path" to true human excellence. It is the "countercultural virtue" needed to oppose the deep hypocrisy found in modern society.
While Rousseau extolled the power of sincerity, the twentieth-century German philosopher Martin Heidegger significantly influenced today's understanding of a closely related idea: authenticity. In his magnum opus, a massive and deeply influential book titled Being and Time, Heidegger considered how the self gets lost and buried in the public world. In everyday life, individuals think and exist primarily in terms of the other people they encounter. This way of being is what Heidegger called the "they-self." He stated, "Everyone is the other, and no one is himself." He meant that people often lose their individual identity by simply following the crowd and adhering to collective norms.
Heidegger believed that people are inauthentic when they are driven into an "uninhibited hustle" within the world. They distract themselves from the deep, unsettling anxiety about the true meaning of human life and its eventual, inevitable end. Instead of facing these hard, uncomfortable questions, people fill their time with busy work and superficial activities. In his later work, Heidegger argued that everything and everyone in contemporary life had become technological. People began to treat everything as raw material for "exploitation." For example, in the technological age, the Rhine River is not seen as a "river" with its own natural beauty and mystery. Instead, it is merely "something at our command," a supplier of "water power" to generate electricity for human use.
"Everywhere everything is ordered to stand by, to be immediately at hand," he claimed, "indeed to stand there just so that it may be on call for a further ordering." This idea extends even to human beings themselves. We are now often referred to as "human resources," like tools or data points rather than unique individuals with deep, complex inner lives. By contrast, the authentic human being is called to choose and to be the self, rather than being for the sake of others. They do not flee from the reality of death. Instead, by discovering the world in this honest way, it feels like clearing away "concealments and obscurities" that hide the truth of existence.
Still, Heidegger did not explicitly say that authenticity is the human excellence or the "highest good." As political philosophy professor Mark Blitz articulates, Heidegger's authenticity is the "true understanding of what human beings actually are." From this perspective, authentic human beings are able to confront and grasp the heavy, burdensome responsibility they have for their own existence. They accept that they must define their own meaning in a world that offers no guarantees and provides no external validation.
Despite the current, almost frantic obsession with sincerity and authenticity, I believe it is vital to put these concepts in proper perspective. They might be added to a list of classical virtues, including courage, moderation, justice, and prudence, rather than completely replacing them. There may be nothing intrinsically dangerous about pursuing authenticity. In many cases, it is clear that people ought to be left to be who they want to be. However, there are still a few obvious limits that must be respected.
At the very least, authenticity must be bound by justice. What if someone being their "authentic self" harms the environment or hurts others? Some people are "sincere" or "authentic" while committing all kinds of harmful actions. They might say, "I am just being honest," while insulting others or destroying property. While each of us may pursue authenticity to find our true path, we should also remember that just and peaceful relations require the celebration of both difference and mutual respect. Being true to oneself is a noble goal, but it cannot come at the expense of the well-being of the community or the fairness of our shared society. We must balance our individual truth with our duties to one another. We cannot allow our desire for personal freedom to override the rights and safety of everyone else in our shared world.