Trump’s EPA decides climate change doesn’t endanger public health – the evidence says otherwise
theconversation.com
On February 12, 2026, the Trump administration initiated a significant policy reversal intended to overturn a foundational scientific determination made in 2009. This earlier finding, known as the "endangerment finding," formally established that six greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide and methane released by burning fossil fuels, pose a serious and immediate danger to public health and general welfare. The administration's decision to dismiss these scientifically validated risks is not only factually incorrect but also constitutes a direct threat to the safety of the American population.
As specialists in medicine, epidemiology, and environmental health, we observe a consistent and rapidly expanding body of evidence that links climate change to tangible physical harm. These connections are clear, documented, and span multiple critical domains of human health. This article examines the primary health risks that are becoming increasingly intensified by a warming planet.
Greenhouse gases accumulate within the atmosphere, functioning like a thick blanket that traps solar heat near the Earth's surface. This process elevates global average temperatures, resulting in more frequent and severe heat exposure for populations worldwide. While many individuals recover from minor heat-related illnesses, extreme heat exposure can be fatal, particularly for those lacking adequate hydration or access to cooling systems. Outdoor workers, the elderly, and individuals with preexisting conditions such as heart, lung, or kidney disease face disproportionately high risks of severe illness and death.
Global heat-related fatalities have demonstrated a concerning upward trend. From the 1990s through the 2010s, these deaths increased by 23 percent, with an annual average exceeding half a million lives lost. A stark example occurred in 2021, when a massive heat dome settled over the Pacific Northwest, resulting in hundreds of fatalities across the United States. Climate models project that as climate change progresses, numerous regions will experience a surge in days with temperatures that threaten human survival. This includes major U.S. metropolitan areas such as Miami, Houston, Phoenix, and Las Vegas, where heat stress will become a daily reality for millions.
A warmer atmosphere retains greater moisture, leading to more intense precipitation events, stronger storms, and increased flooding, as many U.S. communities have directly experienced in recent years. Concurrently, warmer ocean temperatures provide additional energy, fueling more powerful hurricanes. The health consequences of increased flooding are severe, encompassing drownings, physical injuries, and water contamination from pathogens and industrial chemicals. Individuals engaged in post-flood cleanup face further hazards, including exposure to toxic mold, physical trauma, and significant psychological distress. As seen in the aftermath of major storms, the ripple effects on community health can persist for years.
Climate change also exacerbates drought conditions, which disrupt agricultural production and threaten food security while increasing respiratory illnesses caused by airborne dust particles. Elevated temperatures and prolonged dry periods desiccate forests and grasslands, creating ideal conditions for catastrophic wildfires that consume vast areas and endanger lives.
Wildfires, amplified by climatic changes, are a major contributor to deteriorating air quality across the nation. Wildfire smoke contains a hazardous mixture of fine particulate matter, known as PM2.5. These microscopic particles penetrate deep into lung tissue and enter the bloodstream. The smoke also carries dangerous compounds such as lead, formaldehyde, and dioxins, which form when synthetic materials in homes and vehicles burn at high temperatures. Smoke plumes can travel thousands of miles, elevating risks for heart attacks and lung cancer in populations far from the fire's origin.
Furthermore, warmer atmospheric conditions accelerate the formation of ground-level ozone, a potent irritant to the heart and lungs. The combustion of fossil fuels directly releases a suite of harmful air pollutants. Exposure to these pollutants is linked to a wide range of health problems, including heart attacks, strokes, asthma exacerbations, and lung cancer. The combined effect of ozone and particulate matter creates a toxic environment that places a heavy burden on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems.
Climate change directly influences the spread of infectious diseases. Insects like mosquitoes are cold-blooded; their metabolism and behavior are highly sensitive to temperature. Rising temperatures increase mosquito biting rates and accelerate the development of pathogens they carry within their bodies. Consequently, mosquito-borne illnesses are expanding their geographic range significantly.
Cases of dengue fever have been reported in Florida, Texas, Hawaii, Arizona, and California, areas that previously saw little to no transmission. New York State recently documented its first locally acquired case of chikungunya virus, another disease transmitted by mosquitoes. The geographic shift is rapid and indicates that the window for transmission is opening in regions where it was previously too cold.
The impact extends beyond insect vectors. Warmer conditions promote the growth of bacteria like Vibrio cholerae, increasing risks of diarrheal and foodborne illnesses. Heavy rainfall events can overwhelm sewage systems, leading to contaminated overflows into recreational and drinking water sources. Conversely, drought conditions in the Southwestern U.S. increase the risk of coccidioidomycosis, a serious fungal infection commonly known as valley fever, which thrives in dry, dusty soil.
The health implications of climate change are multifaceted and complex. Lengthened pollen seasons intensify allergen exposure for millions, leading to more severe respiratory issues. Reduced crop yields compromise nutritional security, potentially leading to malnutrition and related health declines. The psychological toll is substantial, with increased incidence of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder following climate-related disasters. Epidemiological studies also identify correlations between high-temperature days and elevated rates of violent crime and suicide, suggesting that heat affects mental and social stability.
Vulnerable populations bear the greatest burden of these changes. Young children, older adults, pregnant individuals, and those with chronic medical conditions are at heightened risk. Socioeconomic factors compound these dangers; lower-income communities often experience higher rates of preexisting disease, greater exposure to climate hazards, and possess fewer resources for protective measures, healthcare, and disaster recovery. This inequity means that those least responsible for emissions often suffer the most severe consequences.
The scientific evidence connecting climate change to adverse health outcomes has grown substantially since the 2009 endangerment finding was established. Today, the link is indisputable. A robust body of research demonstrates that heat stress, air pollution, infectious disease dynamics, and food insecurity—all exacerbated by climate change—contribute to millions of preventable deaths globally each year. This evidence aligns with the lived experiences of countless Americans. Anyone who has suffered illness during a heatwave, struggled to breathe during episodes of wildfire smoke, or faced injury while recovering from a hurricane understands that climate change is a direct threat to human health.
Despite this consensus, the Trump administration has chosen to willfully ignore the scientific record by asserting that climate change does not endanger health. The move to rescind the endangerment finding, which serves as the legal foundation for numerous climate regulations, is consistent with a broader policy agenda. This agenda includes reducing support for renewable energy development while continuing subsidies for fossil fuel industries, whose operations directly contribute to public health risks. In tandem with rescinding the endangerment finding, the administration also moved to weaken vehicle emissions standards. The transportation sector is the largest source of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions and a major contributor to harmful pollutants like PM2.5 and ozone.
The evidence conclusively shows that climate change endangers human health. However, a critical corollary exists: actions taken to mitigate climate change also offer profound public health benefits. Policies that promote cleaner vehicles and electricity generation lead to immediate improvements in air quality, resulting in less cardiovascular and respiratory disease. Urban planning that supports safe walking and cycling infrastructure encourages physical activity, reducing risks for chronic conditions such as diabetes and obesity. The potential co-benefits are extensive and far-reaching.
By decisively confronting the drivers of climate change, society can simultaneously advance population health. To genuinely safeguard public health, the nation must acknowledge the scientific facts underpinning the endangerment finding. A responsible path forward involves accelerating the transition away from fossil fuel dependence toward a future powered by healthy, clean energy sources. This transition is not merely an environmental imperative but a fundamental public health necessity that must be embraced to protect current and future generations.
This article incorporates material from a report originally published on November 12, 2025.