Deposit Scheme Proposed to Curb Vape Litter

Waste management companies are urging the government to implement a deposit scheme for disposable vapes. The proposal suggests charging a deposit of up to five pounds when customers buy these devices. The goal is to encourage people to return their used vapes for proper disposal. This measure aims to reduce the amount of electronic waste that ends up in regular trash bins or on the streets.

The ban on disposable vapes was introduced one year ago. This policy change was driven by significant problems at waste facilities. When vapes are thrown away with general household rubbish, they cause safety hazards. The lithium-ion batteries inside these devices can spark fires. These fires damage bin lorries and create risks for workers at waste processing centers.

Despite the ban, the industry body for waste companies states that recycling rates have not improved sufficiently. The Environmental Services Association (ESA) argues that a small, refundable deposit at the point of purchase is the best solution. They describe this approach as simple, fair, efficient, and cost-neutral. The deposit would be added to the price of the vape when it is bought. Customers would receive this money back when they return the empty device to a designated recycling point.

Vapes can already be returned to the stores where they are purchased. These stores are required to have facilities for taking back used devices. Alternatively, customers can drop them off at specific recycling centers. It is important that vapes are never placed in normal household bins, general recycling streams, or littered in the environment. Doing so creates environmental pollution and safety dangers.

The ESA emphasizes that the deposit amount must be high enough to motivate people. If the incentive is too small, it will not change behavior. Biffa, the largest waste management company in the United Kingdom, has suggested a five-pound deposit. However, this specific figure is subject to public consultation if the proposal moves forward. The exact amount would need to balance effectiveness with consumer affordability.